↓ Skip to main content

Exome sequencing in one family with gastric- and rectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomic Data, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exome sequencing in one family with gastric- and rectal cancer
Published in
BMC Genomic Data, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12863-016-0351-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessada Thutkawkorapin, Simone Picelli, Vinaykumar Kontham, Tao Liu, Daniel Nilsson, Annika Lindblom

Abstract

Heritable factors are well known to increase the risk of cancer in families. Known susceptibility genes account for a small proportion of all colorectal cancer cases. The aim of this study was to identify the genetic background in a family suggested to segregate a dominant cancer syndrome with a high risk of rectal- and gastric cancer. We performed whole exome sequencing in three family members, 2 with rectal cancer and 1 with gastric cancer and followed it up in additional family members, other patients and controls. We identified 12 novel non-synonymous single nucleotide variants, which were shared among 5 affected members of this family. The mutations were found in 12 different genes; DZIP1L, PCOLCE2, IGSF10, SUCNR1, OR13C8, EPB41L4B, SEC16A, NOTCH1, TAS2R7, SF3A1, GAL3ST1, and TRIOBP. None of the mutations was suggested as a high penetrant mutation. It was not possible to completely rule out any of the mutations as contributing to disease, although seven were more unlikely than the others. Neither did we rule out the effect of all thousands of intronic, intergenic and synonymous variants shared between the three persons used for exome sequencing. We propose this family, suggested to segregate dominant disease, could be an example of complex inheritance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Unspecified 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 23%
Unspecified 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#668
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,975
of 410,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#20
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.