↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge and perceptions of asthma in Zambia: a cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge and perceptions of asthma in Zambia: a cross-sectional survey
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12890-016-0195-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilia Jumbe Marsden, Somwe Wa Somwe, Chishala Chabala, Joan B. Soriano, Cesar Picado Vallès, Julio Anchochea

Abstract

Zambia is currently experiencing an epidemiological transition, from communicable to non-communicable diseases. The annual rate of physician-diagnosed asthma is estimated at 3 %. However, the general public's knowledge of asthma symptoms and signs, and their perception of asthma remain unknown. A survey was conducted aiming to determine knowledge and perceptions of asthma among Zambians. Adults and adolescents attending four clinics in the capital, Lusaka, were surveyed using a standardized questionnaire from July 2011 to March 2012. Data from 1,540 participants (mean age 30.7 years, 65 % female) were collected. Most patients (74 %) were living in low-cost housing. One hundred and sixteen (7.6 %) participants reported either a medical diagnosis of asthma or currently taking asthma medications. The most frequent asthma symptoms reported were wheezing (88 %), and waking up at night with either shortness of breath (85 %), chest tightness (85 %), or cough (67 %). Medications used to treat asthma were mostly oral short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) (59 %), inhaled SABA (30.2 %) and antibiotics (29.8 %). Inhaled steroids were only used by 16.4 % while less than 1 % were on long-acting beta-agonists (LABA). Many misconceptions were identified among the entire surveyed population with only 54.7 % believing hospitalisations are not preventable, 54.7 % believing asthma symptoms can be prevented with the right medications and 37 % believing inhalers are addictive. Nearly 60 % thought that people with asthma cannot exercise or play hard. Significantly more individuals with asthma compared to those without thought tablets are better than inhalers for the treatment of asthma (46 % vs 30 %). We conclude that knowledge on asthma is poor in Zambia, where there remains many misconceptions on asthma and its management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 38 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 9%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 41 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,836,083
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#963
of 1,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,866
of 400,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#21
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.