You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Department of Defense influenza and other respiratory disease surveillance during the 2009 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s2-s6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronald L Burke, Kelly G Vest, Angelia A Eick, Jose L Sanchez, Matthew C Johns, Julie A Pavlin, Richard G Jarman, Jerry L Mothershead, Miguel Quintana, Thomas Palys, Michael J Cooper, Jian Guan, David Schnabel, John Waitumbi, Alisa Wilma, Candelaria Daniels, Matthew L Brown, Steven Tobias, Matthew R Kasper, Maya Williams, Jeffrey A Tjaden, Buhari Oyofo, Timothy Styles, Patrick J Blair, Anthony Hawksworth, Joel M Montgomery, Hugo Razuri, Alberto Laguna-Torres, Randal J Schoepp, David A Norwood, Victor H MacIntosh, Thomas Gibbons, Gregory C Gray, David L Blazes, Kevin L Russell, AFHSC-GEIS Influenza Surveillance Writing Group |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 26% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,458
of 17,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,273
of 120,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#73
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.