You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy of the Delirium Observational Screening Scale (DOS) as a screening tool for delirium in patients with advanced cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-019-5351-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabeth C. W. Neefjes, Maurice J. D. L. van der Vorst, Manon S. A. Boddaert, Bea A. T. T. Verdegaal, Aart Beeker, Saskia C. C. Teunissen, Aartjan T. F. Beekman, Wouter W. A. Zuurmond, Johannes Berkhof, Henk M. W. Verheul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 158 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 15% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 63 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,557,279
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,452
of 8,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,803
of 353,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#83
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,442 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.