↓ Skip to main content

Falls and consequent injuries in hospitalized patients: effects of an interdisciplinary falls prevention program

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Falls and consequent injuries in hospitalized patients: effects of an interdisciplinary falls prevention program
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-6-69
Pubmed ID
Authors

René Schwendimann, Hugo Bühler, Sabina De Geest, Koen Milisen

Abstract

Patient falls in hospitals are common and may lead to negative outcomes such as injuries, prolonged hospitalization and legal liability. Consequently, various hospital falls prevention programs have been implemented in the last decades. However, most of the programs had no sustained effects on falls reduction over extended periods of time. This study used a serial survey design to examine in-patient fall rates and consequent injuries before and after the implementation of an interdisciplinary falls prevention program (IFP) in a 300-bed urban public hospital. The population under study included adult patients, hospitalized in the departments of internal medicine, geriatrics, and surgery. Administrative patient data and fall incident report data from 1999 to 2003 were examined and summarized using frequencies, proportions, means and standard deviations and were analyzed accordingly. A total of 34,972 hospitalized patients (mean age: 67.3, SD +/- 19.3 years; female 53.6%, mean length of stay: 11.9 +/- 13.2 days, mean nursing care time per day: 3.5 +/- 1.4 hours) were observed during the study period. Overall, a total of 3,842 falls affected 2,512 (7.2%) of the hospitalized patients. From these falls, 2,552 (66.4%) were without injuries, while 1,142 (29.7%) falls resulted in minor injuries, and 148 (3.9%) falls resulted in major injuries. The overall fall rate in the hospitals' patient population was 8.9 falls per 1,000 patient days. The fall rates fluctuated slightly from 9.1 falls in 1999 to 8.6 falls in 2003. After the implementation of the IFP, in 2001 a slight decrease to 7.8 falls per 1,000 patient days was observed (p = 0.086). The annual proportion of minor and major injuries did not decrease after the implementation of the IFP. From 1999 to 2003, patient characteristics changed in terms of slight increases (female gender, age, consumed nursing care time) or decreases (length of hospital stay), as well as the prevalence of fall risk factors increased up to 46.8% in those patients who fell. Following the implementation of an interdisciplinary falls prevention program, neither the frequencies of falls nor consequent injuries decreased substantially. Future studies need to incorporate strategies to maximize and evaluate ongoing adherence to interventions in hospital falls prevention programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 189 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 21%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 22%
Engineering 9 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,359,595
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,565
of 7,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,521
of 155,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#43
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.