↓ Skip to main content

Tackling complexities in understanding the social determinants of health: the contribution of ethnographic research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tackling complexities in understanding the social determinants of health: the contribution of ethnographic research
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s5-s6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mridula Bandyopadhyay

Abstract

The complexities inherent in understanding the social determinants of health are often not well-served by quantitative approaches. My aim is to show that well-designed and well-conducted ethnographic studies have an important contribution to make in this regard. Ethnographic research designs are a difficult but rigorous approach to research questions that require us to understand the complexity of people's social and cultural lives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 124 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 26%
Social Sciences 20 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Psychology 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2012.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#14,673
of 17,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,091
of 246,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#186
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.