You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Working towards a new psychiatry - neuroscience, technology and the DSM-5
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1747-5341-7-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabina Alam, Jigisha Patel, James Giordano |
| Abstract |
This Editorial introduces the thematic series on 'Toward a New Psychiatry: Philosophical and Ethical Issues in Classification, Diagnosis and Care' http://www.biomedcentral.com/series/newpsychiatry. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 38% |
| Psychology | 11 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2013.
All research outputs
#1,760,689
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#44
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,562
of 243,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.