The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Concurrent anemia and stunting in young children: prevalence, dietary and non-dietary associated factors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-019-0436-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shimels Hussien Mohammed, Bagher Larijani, Ahmad Esmaillzadeh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 427 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 52 | 12% |
Student > Master | 48 | 11% |
Lecturer | 42 | 10% |
Researcher | 21 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 5% |
Other | 48 | 11% |
Unknown | 195 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 87 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
Other | 44 | 10% |
Unknown | 201 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,003,352
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#695
of 1,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,170
of 352,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.