↓ Skip to main content

Rationale and design of FORTH: a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of HIV self-testing in increasing HIV testing frequency among gay and bisexual men

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationale and design of FORTH: a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of HIV self-testing in increasing HIV testing frequency among gay and bisexual men
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12879-015-1300-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad S. Jamil, Garrett Prestage, Christopher K. Fairley, Kirsty S. Smith, John M. Kaldor, Andrew E. Grulich, Anna M. McNulty, Marcus Chen, Martin Holt, Damian P. Conway, Handan Wand, Phillip Keen, Colin Batrouney, Jack Bradley, Benjamin R. Bavinton, Dermot Ryan, Darren Russell, Rebecca J. Guy

Abstract

Gay and bisexual men (GBM) are a major risk group for HIV acquisition, yet the majority of higher-risk GBM test for HIV less often than recommended (3-6 monthly). HIV self-testing has the potential to increase testing frequency and improve awareness of personal HIV status. HIV self-tests have been approved in some countries, however there are concerns whether self-testing would increase HIV testing frequency enough to compensate for the reduced sensitivity of self-tests in early infection. We describe here a randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of self-testing in increasing HIV testing frequency among higher-risk GBM, and its acceptability. Participants are higher-risk HIV negative GBM (>5 partners or condomless anal intercourse in previous 3 months; n = 350), including 50 GBM who tested for HIV over two years ago or never tested before ('infrequent-testers'). Participants are recruited from sexual health clinics and community-based organisations, and randomised 1:1 to either self-testing or standard-care (routine clinic-based testing) arms. The trial employs a wait-list control design: participants in the standard-care arm switch to self-testing arm in the second year, and gain access to self-test kits. Participants in the self-testing arm receive four oral-fluid self-test kits at enrolment, with additional kits provided on request. Demographics, sexual behaviour and HIV testing preferences are collected at baseline, and the frequency and pattern of HIV and sexually transmissible infection (STI) testing is collected via online 3-monthly questionnaires. The acceptability of self-testing is assessed at 12 months via an online questionnaire and in-depth interviews. A 24-h telephone support is provided, with expedited follow-up of those with reactive self-test results. The primary outcome is HIV testing frequency (mean number of HIV tests per person) over 12 months, and the secondary outcomes are: mean number of STI tests (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis) per person; reasons for HIV testing; and acceptability of HIV self-testing. This is the first trial to evaluate the use of self-testing among GBM in Australia, and the first internationally among infrequent testers. The study will provide evidence on whether self-testing increases HIV testing frequency, and its acceptability among GBM. The findings will improve our understanding of self-testing patterns, and whether GBM supplement or replace their existing testing routine. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registration number: ACTRN12613001236785 , registered on November 12, 2013.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 24%
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Social Sciences 13 12%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 28 27%