You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical utility of biomarkers of endothelial activation in sepsis-a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc11145 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katharine Xing, Srinivas Murthy, W Conrad Liles, Jeffrey M Singh |
Abstract |
A strong biologic rationale exists for targeting markers of endothelial cell (EC) activation as clinically informative biomarkers to improve diagnosis, prognostic evaluation or risk-stratification of patients with sepsis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 146 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 17% |
Researcher | 22 | 14% |
Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
Other | 36 | 23% |
Unknown | 21 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 57% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Unknown | 25 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,008
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,531
of 257,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#21
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.