You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact generated by publicly and charity-funded research in the United Kingdom: a systematic literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0425-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Gomes, Charitini Stavropoulou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Australia | 2 | 17% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,634,756
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#664
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,354
of 353,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#33
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.