↓ Skip to main content

A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Volcanology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits
Published in
Journal of Applied Volcanology, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13617-018-0081-1
Authors

Sébastien Biass, Costanza Bonadonna, Bruce F. Houghton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Master 9 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 33 77%
Unspecified 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,967,390
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Volcanology
#69
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,078
of 470,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Volcanology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them