↓ Skip to main content

The economic burden of bronchiectasis – known and unknown: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The economic burden of bronchiectasis – known and unknown: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12890-019-0818-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pieter C. Goeminne, Francisco Hernandez, Roland Diel, Anna Filonenko, Rowena Hughes, Fabian Juelich, George M. Solomon, Alex Upton, Kamonthip Wichmann, Weiwei Xu, James D. Chalmers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 54 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 62 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,710,078
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#168
of 1,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,607
of 354,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#4
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.