↓ Skip to main content

Removing prophylactic antibiotics from pig feed: how does it affect their performance and health?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Removing prophylactic antibiotics from pig feed: how does it affect their performance and health?
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12917-019-1808-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessia Diana, Laura A. Boyle, Finola C. Leonard, Ciaran Carroll, Eugene Sheehan, Declan Murphy, Edgar G. Manzanilla

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 19 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 34 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,160,058
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#224
of 3,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,736
of 354,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#3
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,099 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.