↓ Skip to main content

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting with an improved rib spreader and a new-shaped cardiac stabilizer: results of 200 consecutive cases in a single institution

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting with an improved rib spreader and a new-shaped cardiac stabilizer: results of 200 consecutive cases in a single institution
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12872-016-0216-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunpeng Ling, Liming Bao, Wei Yang, Yu Chen, Qing Gao

Abstract

Performing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting via small chest incisions on a beating heart is challenging. We report our experiences of MIDCAB with the utilization of both an improved rib spreader to harvest the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and a new-shaped cardiac stabilizer to facilitate LIMA-left anterior descending (LAD) coronary anastomosis. Between May 2012 and June 2104, a total of 200 patients who were consecutively operated on in this period were enrolled in this study. Data reported included demographic information, preoperative clinical and cardiac status, LIMA harvest time, postoperative in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day mortality. The average LIMA harvest time was 43 min. The mean age was 62.59 ± 10.19 years, and 45 of the 200 were females. The 30-day mortality was 0.5 % (one patient) due to perioperative myocardial infarction. Duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in intensive care unit was 9.27 ± 7.65 and 24.27 ± 17.85 h, respectively. The unit of packed RBC transfusion was 0.79 ± 1.58. Postoperative atrial fibrillation was observed in 14 (7 %) patients. There was no postoperative stroke, renal failure, or incision complication. Performing MIDCAB with the improved retractor and stabilizer utilized in this study showed favorable outcomes in terms of harvesting the LIMA, postoperative morbidities, and 30-day mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 47%
Engineering 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1,437
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,997
of 300,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#30
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.