↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of glycolytic enzyme hexokinase II (HK2) suppresses lung tumor growth

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell International, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibition of glycolytic enzyme hexokinase II (HK2) suppresses lung tumor growth
Published in
Cancer Cell International, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12935-016-0280-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huanan Wang, Lei Wang, Yingjie Zhang, Ji Wang, Yibin Deng, Degui Lin

Abstract

The most common genetic changes identified in human NSCLC are Kras mutations (10-30 %) and p53 mutation or loss (50-70 %). Moreover, NSCLC with mutations in Kras and p53 poorly respond to current therapies, so we are trying to find a new target for the treatment strategies. Flow cytometry, crystal violet staining and immunoblotting were used to assess cell cycle arrest, proliferation and apoptosis in lung cancer cell lines after 2-DG treatment and lentivirus infection by shRNA knock down. IHC and western blotting were carried for NSG xenograft model with 2-DG treatment and lentivirus infection by shRNA knock down. Knocking down Kras down-regulated the glycolytic enzyme hexokinase II (HK2) in KP2 (mouse lung cancer cell line with Kras mutation and p53 deletion) and H23 (human lung cancer cell line with Kras mutation and p53 mutation) cell lines. Genetic studies revealed that HK2 was required for the human and mouse lung cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Our pharmacological studies confirmed that 2-DG, an inhibitor of HK2, inhibited human and mouse lung cancer cell growth through inducing cell apoptosis and autophagy. HK2 is a promising treatment target for NSCLC with Kras activating and p53 function loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,441,836
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#1,088
of 1,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,130
of 297,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,801 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.