↓ Skip to main content

A cross-sectional study on schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths in Mbita district, western Kenya using different copromicroscopic techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross-sectional study on schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths in Mbita district, western Kenya using different copromicroscopic techniques
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1368-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette I. Ng’etich, Fredrick O. Rawago, Walter G. Z. O. Jura, Pauline N. Mwinzi, Kimberly Y. Won, Maurice R. Odiere

Abstract

Identification of populations to be targeted for individual treatment and broad-spectrum therapy in schistosomiasis-endemic areas, assessment of therapy efficacy, morbidity, and evaluation of control strategies need to be based on reliable diagnostic tools. Kato-Katz is routinely used and remains the standard diagnostic technique for schistosomiasis, despite its many challenges. This study was conducted in Nyamanga village, Mbita, western Kenya, and evaluated the diagnostic performance of Kato-Katz, Mini-Parasep and modified Mini-FLOTAC techniques in detection of Schistosoma mansoni and soil-transmitted helminths (Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and hookworm) ova. Stool samples from 132 individuals were screened for eggs of S. mansoni by the 3 techniques. Mini-Parasep® faecal parasite concentrator (Apacor Ltd, England), a single-use diagnostic device with a built-in filter for faecal concentration of helminth eggs by sedimentation was employed on stool samples fixed in 10 % formalin. A modified Mini-FLOTAC (University of Naples, Italy) was based on floatation of helminths eggs with two different solutions (FS2 and FS7) using a closed system (Fill-FLOTAC) with 5 % formalin. Kato-Katz was performed following WHO recommendation. Prevalence of S. mansoni and STH, sensitivity and degree of agreement among the 3 techniques were determined. Prevalence of S. mansoni was 47.0 %, 34.1 % and 20.5 % by Mini-Parasep, Kato-Katz and modified Mini-FLOTAC FS7 techniques, respectively. Prevalence of any STH infection was 6.1 %, 3.0 %, 6.1 % and 6.8 % by Mini-Parasep, Kato-Katz, modified Mini-FLOTAC FS2 and modified Mini-FLOTAC FS7 techniques, respectively. Considering the pooled results of the three methods (Mini-Parasep, Kato-Katz and modified Mini-FLOTAC FS7) as diagnostic 'gold' standard, the sensitivity of Mini-Parasep, Kato-Katz and modified Mini-FLOTAC FS7 for S. mansoni was 77.5 %, 56.1 %, and 33.8 %, respectively. Mini-Parasep and modified Mini-FLOTAC FS7 techniques had moderate (κ = 0.46) and fairly good (κ = 0.25) agreements with Kato-Katz for S. mansoni, respectively. Mini-Parasep detected a higher proportion of light intensity S. mansoni infections compared to Kato-Katz, which detected high proportions of heavy infections. Mini-Parasep detected a similar mean number of S. mansoni eggs per gram (EPG) of stool compared to the standard Kato-Katz (62.9 vs 97.3; t (131) = -0.49, P = 0.6265) and significantly higher EPG compared to the modified Mini-FLOTAC FS7 (62.9 vs 34.6; t (131) = 5.39, P < 0.0001). The high sensitivity of Mini-Parasep suggests its promising potential as an alternative tool in enhancing diagnosis and in monitoring schistosomiasis transmission and determining endpoint of intervention programs, especially in low endemicity areas. Mini-Parasep is also easy to operate, safe and also permits work with fresh stool.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 26%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Lecturer 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 29 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 32 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,948,250
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,477
of 5,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,852
of 304,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#37
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.