↓ Skip to main content

A quick and cost effective method for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A quick and cost effective method for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dziedzom K de Souza, Charles Quaye, Lydia Mosi, Phyllis Addo, Daniel A Boakye

Abstract

Buruli ulcer (BU), a neglected tropical skin disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, has been reported in over 30 countries worldwide and is highly endemic in rural West and Central Africa. The mode of transmission remains unknown and treatment is the only alternative to disease control. Early and effective treatment to prevent the morbid effects of the disease depends on early diagnosis; however, current diagnosis based on clinical presentation and microscopy has to be confirmed by PCR and other tests in reference laboratories. As such confirmed BU diagnosis is either late, inefficient, time consuming or very expensive, and there is the need for an early diagnosis tool at point of care facilities. In this paper we report on a simple, quick and inexpensive diagnostic test that could be used at point of care facilities, in resource-poor settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 1%
Uganda 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 26%
Student > Bachelor 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Chemistry 10 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 10 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,749,220
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,106
of 7,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,291
of 245,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#16
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.