You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proteomic analysis of plasma exosomes to differentiate malignant from benign pulmonary nodules
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12014-019-9225-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muyu Kuang, Xiaoting Tao, Yizhou Peng, Wenjing Zhang, Yafang Pan, Lei Cheng, Chongze Yuan, Yue Zhao, Hengyu Mao, Lingdun Zhuge, Zhenhua Zhou, Haiquan Chen, Yihua Sun |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,021,171
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#53
of 296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,125
of 443,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them