↓ Skip to main content

Using discrete choice experiments to inform the design of complex interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using discrete choice experiments to inform the design of complex interventions
Published in
Trials, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3186-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fern Terris-Prestholt, Nyasule Neke, Jonathan M. Grund, Marya Plotkin, Evodius Kuringe, Haika Osaki, Jason J. Ong, Joseph D. Tucker, Gerry Mshana, Hally Mahler, Helen A. Weiss, Mwita Wambura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 34 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Psychology 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 43 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,759,482
of 20,499,974 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#580
of 5,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,083
of 283,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,499,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them