You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Integrating research and system-wide practice in public health: lessons learnt from Better Start Bradford
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6554-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Josie Dickerson, Philippa K. Bird, Maria Bryant, Nimarta Dharni, Sally Bridges, Kathryn Willan, Sara Ahern, Abigail Dunn, Dea Nielsen, Eleonora P. Uphoff, Tracey Bywater, Claudine Bowyer-Crane, Pinki Sahota, Neil Small, Michaela Howell, Gill Thornton, Kate E. Pickett, Rosemary R. C. McEachan, John Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 55% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
Researcher | 15 | 14% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 12% |
Unknown | 40 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
Psychology | 7 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 46 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,425,171
of 24,510,033 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,560
of 16,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,531
of 358,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#32
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,510,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.