↓ Skip to main content

Freedom and need: The evolution of public strategy for biomedical and health research in England

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Freedom and need: The evolution of public strategy for biomedical and health research in England
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-6-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Shergold, Jonathan Grant

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 7%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 27 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,585,824
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#851
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,261
of 157,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.