You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation and evaluation of a harm-reduction model for clinical care of substance using pregnant women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7517-9-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tricia E Wright, Renee Schuetter, Eric Fombonne, Jessica Stephenson, William F Haning |
| Abstract |
Methamphetamine (MA) use during pregnancy is associated with many pregnancy complications, including preterm birth, small for gestational age, preeclampsia, and abruption. Hawaii has lead the nation in MA use for many years, yet prior to 2007, did not have a comprehensive plan to care for pregnant substance-using women. In 2006, the Hawaii State Legislature funded a pilot perinatal addiction clinic. The Perinatal Addiction Treatment Clinic of Hawaii was built on a harm-reduction model, encompassing perinatal care, transportation, child-care, social services, family planning, motivational incentives, and addiction medicine. We present the implementation model and results from our first one hundred three infants (103) seen over 3 years of operation of the program. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 75% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 13% |
| Czechia | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 391 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 15% |
| Researcher | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 16% |
| Unknown | 96 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 13% |
| Psychology | 42 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 7% |
| Unknown | 114 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,518,081
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#228
of 987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,984
of 251,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.