You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How have researchers defined and used the concept of ‘continuity of care’ for chronic conditions in the context of resource-constrained settings? A scoping review of existing literature and a proposed conceptual framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0426-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lana Meiqari, Tammam Al-Oudat, Dirk Essink, Fedde Scheele, Pamela Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Comoros | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 190 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 75 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 82 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,537,112
of 24,004,724 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#363
of 1,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,564
of 355,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,004,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.