↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of imported severe malaria with artesunate instead of quinine - more evidence needed?

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of imported severe malaria with artesunate instead of quinine - more evidence needed?
Published in
Malaria Journal, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-10-256
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakob P Cramer, Rogelio López-Vélez, Gerd D Burchard, Martin P Grobusch, Peter J de Vries

Abstract

Rapid and fast acting anti-malarials are essential to treat severe malaria. Quinine has been the only option for parenteral therapy until recently. While current evidence shows that intravenous artesunate is more effective than quinine in treating severe malaria in endemic countries, some questions remain regarding safety profiles and drug resistance. For imported severe malaria, additional unanswered questions are related to generalizability of the findings from endemic countries and to legal aspects, as there is no Good Manufacturing Practice-conform drug available yet. Here, the implications of existing evidence for the treatment of imported severe malaria are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 7%
Germany 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
India 1 2%
Pakistan 1 2%
Unknown 39 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 13 28%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,449
of 5,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,893
of 125,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#41
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.