↓ Skip to main content

Tutor assessment of PBL process: does tutor variability affect objectivity and reliability?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tutor assessment of PBL process: does tutor variability affect objectivity and reliability?
Published in
BMC Medical Education, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1508-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bidyadhar Sa, Chidum Ezenwaka, Keerti Singh, Sehlule Vuma, Md. Anwarul Azim Majumder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Lecturer 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 29 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 31 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,907,277
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,164
of 3,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,421
of 351,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#47
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.