You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intravenous Vitamin C administration reduces fatigue in office workers: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sang-Yeon Suh, Woo Kyung Bae, Hong-Yup Ahn, Sung-Eun Choi, Gyou-Chul Jung, Chang Hwan Yeom |
| Abstract |
Studies of the efficacy of vitamin C treatment for fatigue have yielded inconsistent results. One of the reasons for this inconsistency could be the difference in delivery routes. Therefore, we planned a clinical trial with intravenous vitamin C administration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 13 | 27% |
| United States | 9 | 19% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 22% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 315. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#109,196
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#45
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#438
of 252,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.