↓ Skip to main content

Strengthening integrated research and capacity development within the Caribbean region

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strengthening integrated research and capacity development within the Caribbean region
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-11-s2-s7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Forde, Karen Morrison, Eric Dewailly, Neela Badrie, Lyndon Robertson

Abstract

The Caribbean region, like other developing regions of the world, faces significant challenges in conducting research, especially in the context of limited resource capacities and capabilities. Further, due to its diverse and multiple island states, research capacity is scattered and unevenly spread within the region. The Caribbean EcoHealth Programme (CEHP) is a research program that is structured to improve the capacity and capability of health professionals in the Caribbean region to respond in integrative and innovative ways to on-going and emerging environmental health challenges by means of multi-sectoral interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Sierra Leone 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,305
of 17,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,633
of 155,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#145
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.