↓ Skip to main content

Guidance to 2018 good practice: ARIA digitally-enabled, integrated, person-centred care for rhinitis and asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidance to 2018 good practice: ARIA digitally-enabled, integrated, person-centred care for rhinitis and asthma
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13601-019-0252-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Bousquet, A. Bedbrook, W. Czarlewski, G. L. Onorato, S. Arnavielhe, D. Laune, E. Mathieu-Dupas, J. Fonseca, E. Costa, O. Lourenço, M. Morais-Almeida, A. Todo-Bom, M. Illario, E. Menditto, G. W. Canonica, L. Cecchi, R. Monti, L. Napoli, M. T. Ventura, G. De Feo, W. J. Fokkens, N. H. Chavannes, S. Reitsma, A. A. Cruz, J. da Silva, F. S. Serpa, D. Larenas-Linnemann, J. M. Fuentes Perez, Y. R. Huerta-Villalobos, D. Rivero-Yeverino, E. Rodriguez-Zagal, A. Valiulis, R. Dubakiene, R. Emuzyte, V. Kvedariene, I. Annesi-Maesano, H. Blain, P. Bonniaud, I. Bosse, Y. Dauvilliers, P. Devillier, J. F. Fontaine, J. L. Pépin, N. Pham-Thi, F. Portejoie, R. Picard, N. Roche, C. Rolland, P. Schmidt-Grendelmeier, P. Kuna, B. Samolinski, J. M. Anto, V. Cardona, J. Mullol, H. Pinnock, D. Ryan, A. Sheikh, S. Walker, S. Williams, S. Becker, L. Klimek, O. Pfaar, K. C. Bergmann, R. Mösges, T. Zuberbier, R. E. Roller-Wirnsberger, P. V. Tomazic, T. Haahtela, J. Salimäki, S. Toppila-Salmi, E. Valovirta, T. Vasankari, B. Gemicioğlu, A. Yorgancioglu, N. G. Papadopoulos, E. P. Prokopakis, I. G. Tsiligianni, S. Bosnic-Anticevich, R. O’Hehir, J. C. Ivancevich, H. Neffen, M. E. Zernotti, I. Kull, E. Melén, M. Wickman, C. Bachert, P. W. Hellings, G. Brusselle, S. Palkonen, C. Bindslev-Jensen, E. Eller, S. Waserman, L. P. Boulet, J. Bouchard, D. K. Chu, H. J. Schünemann, M. Sova, G. De Vries, M. van Eerd, I. Agache, I. J. Ansotegui, M. Bewick, T. Casale, M. Dykewick, M. Ebisawa, R. Murray, R. Naclerio, Y. Okamoto, D. V. Wallace

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 303 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 11%
Professor 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Student > Master 23 8%
Other 19 6%
Other 68 22%
Unknown 100 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 5%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 3%
Other 58 19%
Unknown 128 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,878,520
of 16,188,470 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#221
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,768
of 270,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,188,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them