↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleonor I Fransson, Solja T Nyberg, Katriina Heikkilä, Lars Alfredsson, De Dirk Bacquer, G David Batty, Sébastien Bonenfant, Annalisa Casini, Els Clays, Marcel Goldberg, France Kittel, Markku Koskenvuo, Anders Knutsson, Constanze Leineweber, Linda L Magnusson Hanson, Maria Nordin, Archana Singh-Manoux, Sakari Suominen, Jussi Vahtera, Peter Westerholm, Hugo Westerlund, Marie Zins, Töres Theorell, Mika Kivimäki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 31 24%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Social Sciences 20 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,735
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,929
of 257,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#103
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.