↓ Skip to main content

Primordial soup or vinaigrette: did the RNA world evolve at acidic pH?

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primordial soup or vinaigrette: did the RNA world evolve at acidic pH?
Published in
Biology Direct, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-7-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harold S Bernhardt, Warren P Tate

Abstract

The RNA world concept has wide, though certainly not unanimous, support within the origin-of-life scientific community. One view is that life may have emerged as early as the Hadean Eon 4.3-3.8 billion years ago with an atmosphere of high CO(2) producing an acidic ocean of the order of pH 3.5-6. Compatible with this scenario is the intriguing proposal that life arose within alkaline (pH 9-11) deep-sea hydrothermal vents like those of the 'Lost City', with the interface with the acidic ocean creating a proton gradient sufficient to drive the first metabolism. However, RNA is most stable at pH 4-5 and is unstable at alkaline pH, raising the possibility that RNA may have first arisen in the acidic ocean itself (possibly near an acidic hydrothermal vent), acidic volcanic lake or comet pond. As the Hadean Eon progressed, the ocean pH is inferred to have gradually risen to near neutral as atmospheric CO(2) levels decreased.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 218 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 19%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Student > Master 34 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 21%
Chemistry 20 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 3%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 43 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,088,730
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#76
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,992
of 251,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.