↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide assessment of imprinted expression in human cells

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide assessment of imprinted expression in human cells
Published in
Genome Biology, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisanne Morcos, Bing Ge, Vonda Koka, Kevin CL Lam, Dmitry K Pokholok, Kevin L Gunderson, Alexandre Montpetit, Dominique J Verlaan, Tomi Pastinen

Abstract

Parent-of-origin-dependent expression of alleles, imprinting, has been suggested to impact a substantial proportion of mammalian genes. Its discovery requires allele-specific detection of expressed transcripts, but in some cases detected allelic expression bias has been interpreted as imprinting without demonstrating compatible transmission patterns and excluding heritable variation. Therefore, we utilized a genome-wide tool exploiting high density genotyping arrays in parallel measurements of genotypes in RNA and DNA to determine allelic expression across the transcriptome in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) and skin fibroblasts derived from families.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Brazil 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 87 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 26%
Researcher 22 22%
Professor 14 14%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 10 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,393
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,206
of 119,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.