You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rationale and study design for a randomised controlled trial to reduce sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: project stand (Sedentary Time ANd diabetes)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-908 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emma G Wilmot, Melanie J Davies, Charlotte L Edwardson, Trish Gorely, Kamlesh Khunti, Myra Nimmo, Thomas Yates, Stuart JH Biddle |
Abstract |
The rising prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a major public health problem. There is an urgent need for effective lifestyle interventions to prevent the development of T2DM. Sedentary behaviour (sitting time) has recently been identified as a risk factor for diabetes, often independent of the time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Project STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes) is a study which aims to reduce sedentary behaviour in younger adults at high risk of T2DM. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 272 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 16% |
Student > Master | 42 | 15% |
Researcher | 40 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
Other | 57 | 20% |
Unknown | 58 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 13% |
Sports and Recreations | 33 | 12% |
Psychology | 14 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
Other | 38 | 13% |
Unknown | 71 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,692,225
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,957
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,699
of 240,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#70
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.