↓ Skip to main content

Microvasculature and intraplaque hemorrhage in atherosclerotic carotid lesions: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microvasculature and intraplaque hemorrhage in atherosclerotic carotid lesions: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12968-019-0524-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geneviève A. J.C. Crombag, Floris H. B.M. Schreuder, Raf H.M. van Hoof, Martine T.B. Truijman, Nicky J.A. Wijnen, Stefan A. Vöö, Patty J. Nelemans, Sylvia Heeneman, Paul J. Nederkoorn, Jan-Willem H. Daemen, Mat J. A.P. Daemen, Werner H. Mess, J.E. Wildberger, Robert J. van Oostenbrugge, M. Eline Kooi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Engineering 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Psychology 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,327,026
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#948
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,170
of 368,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.