You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the relationships between housing, neighbourhoods and mental wellbeing for residents of deprived areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-48 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lyndal Bond, Ade Kearns, Phil Mason, Carol Tannahill, Matt Egan, Elise Whitely |
| Abstract |
Housing-led regeneration has been shown to have limited effects on mental health. Considering housing and neighbourhoods as a psychosocial environment, regeneration may have greater impact on positive mental wellbeing than mental ill-health. This study examined the relationship between the positive mental wellbeing of residents living in deprived areas and their perceptions of their housing and neighbourhoods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 253 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 18% |
| Researcher | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 20% |
| Unknown | 62 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 51 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 11% |
| Psychology | 23 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,801,122
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,138
of 15,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,962
of 251,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#32
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.