You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2362-4 |
Authors |
Libing Jiang, Yi Sheng, Xia Feng, Jing Wu |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 15 | 21% |
United States | 7 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
Colombia | 5 | 7% |
Austria | 2 | 3% |
Japan | 2 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 58 | 81% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
Scientists | 3 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 14% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Professor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
Other | 18 | 26% |
Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 48% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#919,358
of 23,929,753 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#723
of 6,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,616
of 354,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#23
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,929,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.