You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
Critical Care, March 2019
Libing Jiang, Yi Sheng, Xia Feng, Jing Wu
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of||2||3%|
|Members of the public||58||81%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||9||13%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Postgraduate||6||9%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||6||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||33||48%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||4||6%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,929,753 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
of 6,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 354,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,929,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.