↓ Skip to main content

Avipoxviruses: infection biology and their use as vaccine vectors

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avipoxviruses: infection biology and their use as vaccine vectors
Published in
Virology Journal, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-8-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon C Weli, Morten Tryland

Abstract

Avipoxviruses (APVs) belong to the Chordopoxvirinae subfamily of the Poxviridae family. APVs are distributed worldwide and cause disease in domestic, pet and wild birds of many species. APVs are transmitted by aerosols and biting insects, particularly mosquitoes and arthropods and are usually named after the bird species from which they were originally isolated. The virus species Fowlpox virus (FWPV) causes disease in poultry and associated mortality is usually low, but in flocks under stress (other diseases, high production) mortality can reach up to 50%. APVs are also major players in viral vaccine vector development for diseases in human and veterinary medicine. Abortive infection in mammalian cells (no production of progeny viruses) and their ability to accommodate multiple gene inserts are some of the characteristics that make APVs promising vaccine vectors. Although abortive infection in mammalian cells conceivably represents a major vaccine bio-safety advantage, molecular mechanisms restricting APVs to certain hosts are not yet fully understood. This review summarizes the current knowledge relating to APVs, including classification, morphogenesis, host-virus interactions, diagnostics and disease, and also highlights the use of APVs as recombinant vaccine vectors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 37%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,798,113
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#256
of 3,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,570
of 182,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#5
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.