↓ Skip to main content

Gene flow and population structure in the Mexican blind cavefish complex (Astyanax mexicanus)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene flow and population structure in the Mexican blind cavefish complex (Astyanax mexicanus)
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Bradic, Peter Beerli, Francisco J García-de León, Sarai Esquivel-Bobadilla, Richard L Borowsky

Abstract

Cave animals converge evolutionarily on a suite of troglomorphic traits, the best known of which are eyelessness and depigmentation. We studied 11 cave and 10 surface populations of Astyanax mexicanus in order to better understand the evolutionary origins of the cave forms, the basic genetic structuring of both cave and surface populations, and the degree to which present day migration among them affects their genetic divergence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 5 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 226 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 21%
Researcher 45 18%
Student > Master 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 52 21%
Unknown 32 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 149 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 11%
Environmental Science 17 7%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Psychology 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 41 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,479,366
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#636
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,325
of 252,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.