You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rumination in bipolar disorder: evidence for an unquiet mind
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-5380-2-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharmin Ghaznavi, Thilo Deckersbach |
| Abstract |
Depression in bipolar disorder has long been thought to be a state characterized by mental inactivity. However, recent research demonstrates that patients with bipolar disorder engage in rumination, a form of self-focused repetitive cognitive activity, in depressed as well as in manic states. While rumination has long been associated with depressed states in major depressive disorder, the finding that patients with bipolar disorder ruminate in manic states is unique to bipolar disorder and challenges explanations put forward for why people ruminate. We review the research on rumination in bipolar disorder and propose that rumination in bipolar disorder, in both manic and depressed states, reflects executive dysfunction. We also review the neurobiology of bipolar disorder and recent neuroimaging studies of rumination, which is consistent with our hypothesis that the tendency to ruminate reflects executive dysfunction in bipolar disorder. Finally, we relate the neurobiology of rumination to the neurobiology of emotion regulation, which is disrupted in bipolar disorder. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 56% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Armenia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 46% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,892,810
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#22
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,966
of 254,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.