↓ Skip to main content

Could chiropractors screen for adverse drug events in the community? Survey of US chiropractors

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Could chiropractors screen for adverse drug events in the community? Survey of US chiropractors
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-18-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Smith, Lisa Bero, Lynne Carber

Abstract

The "Put Prevention into Practice" campaign of the US Public Health Service (USPHS) was launched with the dissemination of the Clinician's Handbook of Preventive Services that recommended standards of clinical care for various prevention activities, including preventive clinical strategies to reduce the risk of adverse drug events. We explored whether nonprescribing clinicians such as chiropractors may contribute to advancing drug safety initiatives by identifying potential adverse drug events in their chiropractic patients, and by bringing suspected adverse drug events to the attention of the prescribing clinicians.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 26%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Lecturer 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 22%
Psychology 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%