You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Could chiropractors screen for adverse drug events in the community? Survey of US chiropractors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-1340-18-30 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Monica Smith, Lisa Bero, Lynne Carber |
Abstract |
The "Put Prevention into Practice" campaign of the US Public Health Service (USPHS) was launched with the dissemination of the Clinician's Handbook of Preventive Services that recommended standards of clinical care for various prevention activities, including preventive clinical strategies to reduce the risk of adverse drug events. We explored whether nonprescribing clinicians such as chiropractors may contribute to advancing drug safety initiatives by identifying potential adverse drug events in their chiropractic patients, and by bringing suspected adverse drug events to the attention of the prescribing clinicians. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 26% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 22% |
Psychology | 2 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |