You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Direct isolation and characterization of circulating exosomes from biological samples using magnetic nanowires
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-018-0433-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiyun Lim, Mihye Choi, HyungJae Lee, Young-Ho Kim, Ji-Youn Han, Eun Sook Lee, Youngnam Cho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 6% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 64 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,232,080
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#486
of 1,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,512
of 451,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,991 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.