You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
FRAILTOOLS study protocol: a comprehensive validation of frailty assessment tools to screen and diagnose frailty in different clinical and social settings and to provide instruments for integrated care in older adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12877-019-1042-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Checa-López, Myriam Oviedo-Briones, Armando Pardo-Gómez, Jimmy Gonzales-Turín, Tania Guevara-Guevara, José Antonio Carnicero, Shirley Alamo-Ascencio, Francesco Landi, Matteo Cesari, Tomasz Grodzicki, Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 17% |
| Greece | 2 | 6% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 240 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 20% |
| Unknown | 82 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 20% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 88 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,141,630
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#189
of 3,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,257
of 381,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#6
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.