↓ Skip to main content

The contribution of agricultural insecticide use to increasing insecticide resistance in African malaria vectors

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The contribution of agricultural insecticide use to increasing insecticide resistance in African malaria vectors
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1162-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Molly C. Reid, F. Ellis McKenzie

Abstract

The fight against malaria is increasingly threatened by failures in vector control due to growing insecticide resistance. This review examines the recent primary research that addresses the putative relationship between agricultural insecticide use and trends in insecticide resistance. To do so, descriptive evidence offered by the new research was categorized, and additional factors that impact the relationship between agricultural insecticide use and observed insecticide resistance in malaria vectors were identified. In 23 of the 25 relevant recent publications from across Africa, higher resistance in mosquito populations was associated with agricultural insecticide use. This association appears to be affected by crop type, farm pest management strategy and urban development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 261 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 21%
Student > Master 49 18%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 53 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 8%
Environmental Science 14 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 60 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,327,865
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,480
of 5,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,289
of 304,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#32
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.