You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bridging the knowledge-practice gap in tuberculosis contact management in a high-burden setting: a mixed-methods protocol for a multicenter health system strengthening study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0870-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trisasi Lestari, Steve Graham, Christel van den Boogard, Rina Triasih, Jeanne Rini Poespoprodjo, Reynold Rizal Ubra, Enny Kenangalem, Yodi Mahendradhata, Nicholas M. Anstey, Ross S. Bailie, Anna P. Ralph |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 86 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 96 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,443,511
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,492
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,323
of 351,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#34
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.