↓ Skip to main content

Adverse drug reaction classification by health professionals: appropriate discrimination between allergy and intolerance?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adverse drug reaction classification by health professionals: appropriate discrimination between allergy and intolerance?
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13601-019-0259-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sepehr Shakib, Gillian E. Caughey, Jie Shen Fok, William B. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Chemistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,948,871
of 24,976,442 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#174
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,459
of 358,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,976,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.