You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Matthew effect in environmental science publication: A bibliometric analysis of chemical substances in journal articles
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Health, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-10-96 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philippe Grandjean, Mette L Eriksen, Ole Ellegaard, Johan A Wallin |
Abstract |
While environmental research addresses scientific questions of possible societal relevance, it is unclear to what degree research focuses on environmental chemicals in need of documentation for risk assessment purposes. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 94 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 18% |
Student > Master | 18 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Professor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 16 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
Computer Science | 7 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
Other | 23 | 23% |
Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,097,583
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#521
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,795
of 142,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.