You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of a push–pull system consisting of transfluthrin-treated eave ribbons and odour-baited traps for control of indoor- and outdoor-biting malaria vectors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-2714-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arnold S. Mmbando, Elis P. A. Batista, Masoud Kilalangongono, Marceline F. Finda, Emmanuel P. Mwanga, Emmanuel W. Kaindoa, Khamis Kifungo, Rukiyah M. Njalambaha, Halfan S. Ngowo, Alvaro E. Eiras, Fredros O. Okumu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Malawi | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,084,294
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,159
of 5,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,207
of 358,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#25
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.