You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The miRNAome of globe artichoke: conserved and novel micro RNAs and target analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-13-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Domenico De Paola, Federica Cattonaro, Domenico Pignone, Gabriella Sonnante |
| Abstract |
Plant microRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of several processes, including the response to biotic and abiotic stress, often contributing to the adaptive response of the plant to adverse conditions. In addition to conserved miRNAs, found in a wide range of plant species a number of novel species-specific miRNAs, displaying lower levels of expression can be found. Due to low abundance, non conserved miRNAs are difficult to identify and isolate using conventional approaches. Conversely, deep-sequencing of small RNA (sRNA) libraries can detect even poorly expressed miRNAs.No miRNAs from globe artichoke have been described to date. We analyzed the miRNAome from artichoke by deep sequencing four sRNA libraries obtained from NaCl stressed and control leaves and roots. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 29% |
| Researcher | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 70% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,801
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,658
of 10,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,070
of 246,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#163
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.