↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-019-3881-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priya B. Shete, Katherine Farr, Luke Strnad, Christen M. Gray, Adithya Cattamanchi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Lecturer 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 41 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 46 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,360
of 8,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,952
of 368,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#60
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.