↓ Skip to main content

Specifying and comparing implementation strategies across seven large implementation interventions: a practical application of theory

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
53 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Specifying and comparing implementation strategies across seven large implementation interventions: a practical application of theory
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0876-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia K. Perry, Laura J. Damschroder, Jennifer R. Hemler, Tanisha T. Woodson, Sarah S. Ono, Deborah J. Cohen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 263 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 13%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 14 5%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 72 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 16%
Social Sciences 35 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Psychology 20 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 3%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 92 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#999,961
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#146
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,061
of 358,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.